Phase 1: Clarity (Weeks 1-2)
The Clarity phase defines the mandate before any candidate identification begins. This is the phase that most directly determines search quality, and it is the phase most frequently compressed under timeline pressure.
During Clarity, we establish the role's success criteria—not job requirements, but the specific outcomes the organization needs the executive to deliver in years one and two. We define the organizational context: the reporting relationships, stakeholder dynamics, cultural environment, and strategic priorities that the incoming executive will navigate. We identify the competency profile derived from the success criteria, not from the prior incumbent's resume.
We also establish the stakeholder process for candidate evaluation, offer approval, and integration planning. Searches that fail at the offer stage almost always trace back to misaligned stakeholder expectations that were not surfaced in the Clarity phase.
Phase 2: Precision (Weeks 3-6)
The Precision phase covers candidate market mapping, outreach, evaluation, and presentation. This is the most execution-intensive phase and the one where the quality difference between retained and contingency search is most visible.
We map the full market of candidates who meet the defined success criteria. This map includes active candidates—those in transition or explicitly open to new roles—and passive candidates, who represent 70% of the best-fit population. Direct outreach to passive candidates is the primary sourcing mechanism, not job postings or database searches.
Candidate evaluation is structured and criteria-referenced. We assess against the Clarity-phase success criteria, not against general executive competency models. The first candidate presentation typically occurs at week 4-5 and includes 3-5 candidates with full evaluation summaries, not a resume pile.
Client feedback from the first presentation refines the search if needed and accelerates the second evaluation round. Offer recommendation typically follows the second evaluation round at weeks 5-6.
Phase 3: Momentum (Weeks 7-12)
The Momentum phase covers offer negotiation, background verification, and pre-start integration planning. These activities run in parallel to compress the timeline between acceptance and productive start.
Offer negotiation is managed with full transparency on both sides. Our role is to ensure that both the organization and the executive understand what the other party needs for the relationship to work long-term. Negotiation failures that produce regret hires or early departures are preventable with disciplined offer management.
Integration planning begins during the notice period. We facilitate stakeholder introduction planning, first-90-day objective setting, and the organizational communication strategy that sets the executive up for credibility on day one.
The target time-to-impact for a well-placed and well-integrated executive is 90-120 days from start date, against a national average of 6.2 months for executive hires made without structured process.
What Causes Timeline Delays and How to Prevent Them
The three most common causes of executive search timeline extension are: delayed stakeholder feedback during candidate evaluation, offer committee misalignment that surfaces only at the offer stage, and background verification delays when references are not pre-positioned.
All three are preventable with process discipline established in the Clarity phase. Stakeholder alignment on evaluation criteria, offer authority, and reference availability reduces timeline slippage at every subsequent stage.
For a full explanation of our methodology, see our executive search methodology page.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does executive search take from start to finish?
A structured retained executive search typically runs 60-90 days from mandate acceptance to offer acceptance. C-suite searches at the high end of complexity may run 90-120 days. Time-to-impact for the placed executive—when they are operating at full effectiveness—is an additional 90-120 days post-start.
What causes executive search timelines to extend?
The most common causes of timeline extension are incomplete role definition at the outset, delayed feedback from hiring stakeholders during candidate evaluation, and offer negotiation delays. Searches with clearly defined mandates and disciplined stakeholder engagement consistently run faster.
What is the difference between time-to-fill and time-to-impact?
Time-to-fill is the period from search launch to signed offer. Time-to-impact is the period from search launch to when the placed executive is operating at full effectiveness. For senior roles, time-to-impact is typically 90-120 days after the start date, meaning the total timeline from search initiation to full executive effectiveness is 5-7 months.